WHILE THE BROADHEAD REPORTS ARE A WEALTH OF KNOWLEDGE AND SHOULD BE CELEBRATED; BELOW ARE JUST A COUPLE OF THE MANY MYTHS ABOUT HOW SINGLE-BEVEL BROADHEADS MOST EFFICIENTLY AND RAPIDLY PERFORM WORK ACROSS TWO DIFFERENT PLANES AT THE SAME TIME
SIGNIFICANTLY #CRANKUPTHECUT IN HONOR OF LIFE AND THE ANIMAL YOU ARE PURSUING
1. PICK UP A SINGLE TEST HEAD FROM US TODAY
2. THINK FOR YOURSELF BEFORE COMMITTING TO A WHOLE PACK OF OUR PATENT PENDING BROADHEADS OR ANY OTHER BROADHEADS IN THE ARCHERY INDUSTRY
MYTHS OF SINGLE-BEVEL BROADHEAD REPORTS:
TRUE OR FALSE...THE FOLLOWING BROADHEAD DESIGN FEATURES INCREASE BIDIRECTIONAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE ROTATIONAL EFFECTS AND FREQUENCY RATES OF SPIN-CUTTING LACERATION CHANNELS WITH HIGH FREQUENCY “S” BONE BREACHING PASS-THROUGH PENETRATION BASED BLOOD-TRAILS IN EVERYTHING FROM LONGBOWS THROUGH X-BOWS:
1) Single-bevels performing work in two different directions should be built with as close to 3:1 Mechanical Advantage as possible...TRUE OR FALSE
2) Adding vents or bloodgrooves and increasing the length of the broadhead...TRUE OR FALSE
3) Lengthening the broadhead...TRUE OR FALSE
4) Thinning out blade thickness and increasing overall length as close to 3:1 Mechanical Advantage as possible...TRUE OR FALSE
5) Decreasing the cutting diameter and increasing the overall length of the broadhead...TRUE OR FALSE
6) Building a broadhead with a traditional tanto style tip...TRUE OR FALSE
7) Cutting an edge-bevel at 25 degrees...TRUE OR FALSE
8) Cutting an edge-bevel less than 25 degrees...TRUE OR FALSE
TRUE OR FALSE...THE FOLLOWING SINGLE-BEVEL BROADHEAD DESIGN FEATURES IMPROVE EDGE-RETENTION, EDGE-INTEGRITY, RESISTANCE TO TIP CURLING, OVERALL STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY AS WELL AS BIDIRECTIONAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE SPIN-CUTTING BASED ROTATIONAL EFFECTS LEADING TO MORE PASS-THROUGH PENETRATION BLOOD-TRAILS IN EVERYTHING FROM LONGBOWS THROUGH X-BOWS:
1) Single-bevels performing work in two different directions should be built with as close to 3:1 Mechanical Advantage as possible...TRUE OR FALSE
2) Adding vents or bloodgrooves and increasing the length of the broadhead...TRUE OR FALSE
3) Lengthening the broadhead...TRUE OR FALSE
4) Thinning out blade thickness and increasing overall length as close to 3:1 Mechanical Advantage as possible...TRUE OR FALSE
5) Decreasing the cutting diameter and increasing the overall length of the broadhead...TRUE OR FALSE
6) Building a broadhead with a traditional tanto style tip...TRUE OR FALSE
7) Cutting an edge-bevel at 25 degrees...TRUE OR FALSE
8) Cutting an edge-bevel less than 25 degrees...TRUE OR FALSE
OUR BIDIRECTIONAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE DRIVEN
PATENT PENDING SINGLE-BEVELS
ARE NOT THE SAME AS ANY OTHER BROADHEADS ON EARTH
BISHOP BIDIRECTIONAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE R&D
IS INCORPORATED INTO THE FOLLOWING
PATENT PENDING BROADHEAD MODELS IN HONOR OF
GOD AND COUNTRY
PATENT PENDING DICING DRILL TM
PATENT PENDING SCIENTIFIC METHOD TM
PATENT PENDING MECHANICAL ANIMAL DRILL TM
1/6/2017 COMMON QUESTIONS ANSWERS & UPDATES:
LAYPERSON SINGLE-BEVEL BROADHEAD QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
Q: Do longer single-bevel broadheads spin-cut more?
A: NO, they spin-cut considerably less and breached bone much less than shorter, thicker single-bevels with steeper angles. But, even in 25 degree edge-bevel single-bevels, the shorter, steeper blade-angle heads with 25 degree-bevels pop bone more frequently in bows from 14 LBS youth bows to 185 LBS X-BOWS. Longer heads provide substantially more resistance to their own rotational effects than shorter heads. Through the years we had so many biases ourselves about everything from trying to show statistical significance of 3:1 to misconceptions and our own basis and ignorance about steep blade angles not supposed to be able to penetrate as well as traditional heads that we let our assumptions get in the way of real progress. Steep blade-angles and short thick single-bevel heads are actually excellent little bone "S" poppers and with a steep bevel, there is little reason to ever shoot a double-bevel again. Ironically there are some really ignorant archers out there that will try to say our heads are for elephant hunting only, or compounds only and no good for trad and other absolutes bound in ignorance and dogma more than fact.
Q: But, with what you were saying before that with the single-bevels and little reason now to shoot double-bevels. Don't you make double-bevels as well?
A: Yes, we do make them and some folks want a double-bevel. It is not to put double-bevels down at all, as they have their positives as well, but with our higher revolution "S" bone popping single-bevels and steeper edge-bevel angles, along with our proprietary tool steels the downsides of yesterday's single-bevels have been remedied to the extreme.
Q: Is a 40 degree bevel larger than a 25 degree bevel?
A: No, but a 40 degree single-bevel is much steeper and performs more work to breach bone and spin-cut with more bidirectional mechanical advantage than any 25 degree single-bevel ever dreamed of per grain weight. Increased structural integrity and resistance to tip-curl is a positive side effect, as well as a new kind of field-tip POI as the heads are made shorter and thicker. Shortening and thickening the head can make a huge 40 or even 45 degree single-bevel. It does not discriminate which type of archery gear is used.
Q: Do 40 degree and 45 degree bevels need to be thick?
A: Yes, the thicker the better and as the blade thickness is increased so is the size of the bevel and the amount it is manipulated. This also inadvertently increases structural integrity, resists tip curl and improves arrow flight.
Q: Why not just make a sub 25 degree bevel as it would be a huge bevel even in thin blades?
A: A 25 degree and sub 25 degree bevel cannot perform as much bone breaching and spin-cutting as steeper bevels. We have built almost four inch long blades with 25 degree and sub 25 degree bevels with 7/8 inch cutting diameters far beyond 3:1 and they penetrated less, breached bone less and popped open bone less than short stubby single-bevels that at that time had 25 degree bevels. Later on we improved their efficiency even further by changing the angle of the bevel to be steeper and learned how to modify the tanto-tip to allow the bevel to perform work sooner.
Q: Will a shorter head out penetrate a 3:1 head?
A: In single-bevels the shorter thicker heads with steeper edge-bevel angles have superior bidirectional mechanical advantage, pass-through and bone splitting, structural integrity, anti-tip curl and a side-effect is field-tip point of impact at unprecedented yardages. The implications for trad and youth bows are more noteworthy than compounds, where bone breaching and pass-through efficiency is at a premium.
Q: What about the steeper blade angles?
A: They also, aid in rotation and "S" bone popping as the shorter the head with the steeper blade angles and edge-bevels, the more it spin cuts and breaches bone. Additionally, extra material can be added to the thickness, which also manipulates the edge-bevel even further. A side-effect is that this new style of single-bevel has less surface area than some mechanicals and achieves field-tip point of impact at unprecedented yardages for trad, youth, compound and X-BOWS.
Q: Wont this rotation decrease penetration?
A: For three years in various bison products and now from third-party observations by users of our Patent Pending Single-Bevels, they "S" pop open bone and lead to more pass-throughs compared to the less efficient broadhead report style single-bevels. We are always learning and trying to have an open mind, but at this point we have taken Bidirectional Mechanical Advantage and pass-through propensity as far as we can in our patent pending heads. If we could do it again, we would have made the 200-315 Grain Scientific Methods even shorter and thicker.
Q: Why not the 600 grain shorter and thicker?
A: The 600 grain is already substantially thicker than any other broadhead ever mass-produced to this date and thus has the most manipulated 40 degree edge-bevel in history as of this writing. Additionally, it would not make weight if it was shorter and thicker as the thickness would not make up weight enough to hit 600 Grains as it was built with the machines maxed out. We knew we wanted 550-850 grains and it was made by maxing out the machines. The other Patent Pending prototypes in Dicing Drill and Scientific Method all came from cut up and JB Welded Abowyer and Grizzly heads. With steeper bevels we actually ended up with 1 inch and less cutting diameters at that time. We started shortening the Abowyer and Grizzly heads substantially and adding to the ferrule and the blade thickness to manipulate the bevel even further. At a certain point the glue-on heads were not able to be cut any shorter and we started cutting prototypes out of screw-in Abowyers and lots of them.
Q: How does Bishop feel about Abowyer and Grizzly heads?
A: We all have collected them and admired them...almost worshiped them for several years now and still feel that way about them. Just like the Dalton Drill Stone-Points and rare Benton Straight Blade Stone-Points that inspire us.
Q: How do your heads compare to these more traditional single-bevel heads in rotational effects and overall bone breaching?
A: There is no comparison and thousands of dollars worth of prototypes were cut from Abowyer and Grizzly Heads that were purchased and sacrificed over the years and it is almost sacred around here. We don't like to talk about it or think about the amount of heads we bought and then sacrificed, over the last three years. Just try out a single patent pending Bishop or Bridgeport and decide for yourself as the Abowyer and Grizzly are amazing broadheads and we don't like to talk about it. The Abowyer and Grizzly are almost sacred to us and they both make some great heads.
Q: Will you make a traditional glue-on?
A: Maybe in the #HOLYTRINITY Three-Blade Double-Bevel someday. But, probobly not in our single-bevels, unless we can figure out how to have them stay glued. We tried in our patent pending single-bevels, but they have so much torque that they spun off with hot-melt, JB Weld, Epoxies, and Gorilla Glues in glue-on prototypes. We don't have a solution for it at this point, other than to make a more traditional style single-bevel broadhead, but we are not interested in doing that as we have #CRANKUPTHECUT as a slogan, but it is also what we are sincerely trying to achieve related to bone breaching pass-throughs, even more so than laceration channeling.
Q: Somebody was saying this is why you don't make a left-bevel screw-in. They spin, or have torque as you are stating where instead of coming unglued they unscrew on impact in a left-bevel. Is that it?
A: Yes, even with bow-wax, thread locker, to even resorting to superglue on the threads of left-bevel prototype variations of our patent pending heads, it is a big waste of time. Our single-bevel designs would have to be watered down significantly for them to not come unscrewed on impact in a left-bevel screw-in. We are still working on a glue-on left-bevel and right-bevel with disappointing results, but the screw-in/screw-on left-bevel has been given up on a couple of years ago, even before we started selling broadheads to the public. It is a total waste of time to try to make a left-bevel screw-in and literally more than 90% of the world's arrows are right-offset/right-wing anyways.
SPECIAL ORDER ONLY BLADESMITH PAPER WHEELS
Q: New paper wheels are coming in should clients purchase the newer wheels?
A: No, those super thick 10 inchers on the table are quite a bit more pricey than our standard 8 inch paper wheels and reserved for bladesmiths. They are handmade by the Marine and Patriot, Mike Smith, up in Willits for us to primarily use here. 99% of our clients are better off with the standard thickness 8 inch wheels already on our site and that they already have. No need to spend any money, or buy these big 10 inch custom paper wheels, but we will put a handful of them up on our site in the next couple of weeks, as a special order requiring a larger motor and larger arbor than most folks have. Most of the stack you see is for us to use ourselves and not for sale. The standard 8 inch wheels that fit on any 6 inch bench grinder, or 6 inch bench buffer are the way to go for 99% of our clients. We have also been collaborating with KME for a longtime now and are excited about that patriot maybe putting out a 40 and 45 degree guided system specific to our patent pending broadheads someday. Both Mike and Ron are the best in the business, along with DMT's contributions, it is a wealth of sharpening knowledge and we feel really blessed to be able to collaborate and consult with these sharpening experts. They are the best in the sharpening business and all three companies are 100% Made in the USA.
01/04/2017 COMMON QUESTIONS ANSWERS & UPDATES:
#HOLYTRINITY
The #HOLYTRINITY was released ahead of schedule on Christmas Day of 2016, rather than the initial release date of Easter 2017. The #HOLYTRINITY was well received and sold out in 100 and 125 Grains a few days after its Christmas 2016 release. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDERS AND LEVERAGING US TO THE TOP OF MARKET WITH YOUR GRASSROOTS PATRIOTISM AND VOTES OF CONFIDENCE!!!
11/25/2016 COMMON QUESTIONS ANSWERS & UPDATES:
BACKGROUND
Q: Bishop Archery and Bridgeport Archery has taken premium class broadhead sales away from overseas importers with your Made in America Broadheads. How did Bishop/Bridgeport get started producing premium broadheads and then end up expanding and producing such a wide range of weights and different models of broadheads so quickly, after opening to the public on July 4th of 2016?
A: Some years ago now, we were at first more of a small research group of people who knew how to conduct original research and put the single-bevel broadhead reports into more of an APA and peer-reviewed research style format. In the first couple of years, we never planned on manufacturing broadheads and were attempting to show statistical significance of the Ashby Reports. We admittedly had some strong researcher biases, as all researchers have to different extents and we were pretty adamant about achieving the following at that time:
-
Proliferating, replicating and honoring Dr. Ashby’s broadhead reports through more of an APA lens by showing statistical significance of some of his findings in a peer-reviewed format.
-
Taking broadhead report findings to the next level and having some of Ashby’s conclusions validated in a peer-reviewed style format with metrics set-up by a statistician, where we could show statistical significance and have these various findings published in peer-reviewed journals such as The Journal of Educational Research, American Journal of Physics, and some of the Human Kinetics Journal Publications, as well as a few others that we had in mind to replicate, validate and then submit Ashby Report style single-bevel broadhead findings to.
-
Finally, utilize these research efforts to leverage cut-on-contact single-bevels produced by all manufactures to overcome millions of dollars inadvertently spent by consumers on celebrity paid endorsement deals, magazine advertisements and television show advertisements of disposable fixed blade and mechanical broadheads to better honor the life of the animal.
While the broadhead report style single-bevels seemed to be much more lethal than commercialized fixed disposable blade and expandable broadheads through this type of lens, we hit a brick wall on how we believed single-bevels worked at the time. From the edge-bevel degree, length, thickness, blade plane angles, 3:1 ratios, tanto tip and just about everything else...the effort to show statistical significance was a total failure. After a year or so we started doing several things the complete opposite of the Ashby Reports and felt like we could salvage the time and effort by making a new kind of single-bevel broadhead and selling it privately to fund more research and development. We never planned on selling broadheads to the public or being the first company to pretty much denounce the Ashby Reports.
Q: Do you think the Ashby Reports are bogus?
A: Absolutely not, Dr. Ashby and his work belongs in the Archery Hall of Fame. There are some huge homeruns for bowhunters to harvest life as quickly as possible with archery tackle throughout the Ashby Reports. Also, without his work, Bishop would not have been able to develop the Patent Pending Single-Bevels that we have now. While we have different R&D driven edge-bevel degrees, blade plane angles, tanto tips, thicknesses, overall lengths and various other dramatic opposites of those style heads throughout the market as inspired by the Ashby Reports and then web-linked back to them by various manufacturers...No, everyone here believes he was trying to honor the life of the animal in a way that the commercialized outdoor industry business models are incapable of doing. Dr. Ashby is a hero and an icon. It is just that rather than taking things verbatim we encourage people to shoot one test head of our patent pending single-bevels just one time side by side with any other single-bevel into anything they want to and then decide for themselves which style of head they want to buy packs of or shoot at animals.
Q: You have sold out of broadheads since opening to the public on July 4, 2016. Bishop/Bridgeport has seemed to have done this primarily through free giveaways on chat boards and social media where people have shot your heads that won them in random drawings and then bought more and/or spread the word of how they work differently than other single-bevels with virtually no advertising.
A: It is a grassroots effort where we are putting all of the resources into the broadheads rather than the advertising. This seems like a common sense idea to the common bowhunter, but the truth is that for some decades now the outdoor industry blueprint is to put the money into advertising and paying celebrities to endorse their products as “the best” with very little going into the actual product at times. Consumers pay for all of these advertising and endorsement costs one way, or another per pack and that style of outdoor industry blueprint can breed inferior archery gear that has been more and more outsourced to overseas workforces. While we appreciate and believe in diversity, overseas production is not comparable to what red-blooded Americans can achieve when it comes to making broadheads. The American Made metal injection molded, brazed, welded, stamped stainless disposables are not comparable to Bishop and inconsistent hammer forging is not acceptable. We took broadhead efficiency to breach bone and create pass-through based blood-trails coupled with unprecedented structural integrity to a whole new level. We took the methodical approach bowhunters take in preparing for a hunt and threw the archery industry business plan out the window.
BISHOP/BRIDGEPORT
BIDIRECTIONAL MECHANICAL ADVANTAGE, TM
Q: It has been proliferated that a 25 degree and sub 25 degree single-bevel broadhead spin-cuts while breaching bone with more frequency and “corkscrew cutting” laceration channel rotational effects than single-bevels utilizing bevel angles that are steeper/greater than 25 degrees. Why then do all of the www.bishoparchery.com patent pending single-bevles have a significantly steeper/greater bevel angle than 25 degress and a single-bevel broadhead line-up unlike other broadhead manufacturers on the market?
A: The reason we started experimenting with different types of high carbon and then different types of tool steels in the first place was to try to have the bevel hold up with better edge-integrity at 25 degrees and even below 25 degree edge-bevels. We cut sub-25 degree bevels and the heads spin-cut (cork-screw cut) less and “S” breached bone less, regardless of what information has been propagated. After several months we cut our bevels much steeper/greater than 25 degrees and they performed spin-cutting (cork-screw cutting) channels more frequently and “S” breached bone more often.
Q: Why were you interested in different types of high carbon steels and tool steels at that time, when you guys were trying to emulate what the broadhead reports stated about 25 degree bevels and sub 25 degree bevels?
A: One downfall of single-bevels in the past has been inferior edge-integrity to double-bevels, where the single-bevel is not reinforced and can chip or chatter. A 25 degree and sub 25 degree single-bevel has less material and less support of the edge. Therefore we were trying to get sub 25 degree bevels at the time to hold up with stronger materials specific to broadhead applications. Little did we know at the time that a sub 25 degree bevel did not drive the broadhead to spin-cut more, but it drove it to spin-cut less and breach bone less, regardless of what was being reported and accepted at the time. A steeper bevel like Bishop/Bridgeport uses spin-cuts more of a spiral laceration channel, breaches bone more and has a greater chance of passing through. It also offers more support to the edge integrity of single-bevels.
Q: So a steeper than 25 degree single-bevel spin-cuts laceration channels more prominently, breaches bone more often and has a greater propensity to provide a pass-through based bloodtrails...and all with greater structural integrity?
A: Yes
Q: But, what about the other manufactures and their citing of the broadhead reports to make superior single-bevels?
A: What about them?
Q: Why do you do the opposite things in your Bishops?
A: They work better.
Q: What is the downfall of a single-bevel with a bevel cut steeper than 25 degrees?
A: There isn’t one and this can be tested with two or three broadhead companies that were already making single-bevels with bevels steeper than 25 degrees.
Q: Do those other heads spin-cut laceration channels well and breach bone better than some of the others?
A: Yes, they often did with their steeper edge-bevel angles even when some of the other 25 degree edge-bevel designs were made out of high carbon or tool steel compared to competitors stamped stainless.
Q: Well how are your heads different than these other stamped stainless steel constructed heads then?
A: Our heads are not all concave and are not constructed of stamped stainless steel. Our heads are CNC Machined out of a single piece of our own proprietary tool steels. Our patent pending heads are significantly thicker and shorter than the others just to name a few of the differences that we like better.
Q: Does it matter that your heads are shorter and thicker?
A: Yes, it is as important, if not more important than the degree of the edge-bevel in increasing Bidirectional Mechanical Advantage. The thicker they are the more it manipulates the single-bevel and allows it to perform work. The shorter they are the more they spin-cut gaping laceration channels, breach bone and pass-through with low poundage traditional bows through X-Bows, while resisting tip curl and flying with field-tip point of impact at ultra-long-range yardages. Thickness and length incorporated into broadhead designs are factors as important to Bidirectional Mechanical Advantage as the degree of the edge-bevel. 3:1 Mechanical Advantage was never research based and was a product of pragmatism and social norms in broadhead myths. Single-bevels especially pass-through and breach bone more effectively if they are much shorter than 3:1 especially for youth and trad bows. The shorter and thicker single-bevel broadheads are the more they spin-cut and pop bone. We always believed in 3:1 so our own researcher biases slowed us down for several years on both this and blade angle myths.
Q: But, the reports state the opposite of these claims calling for 3:1 ratios and how are traditional archers supposed to think about these things as they have learned that a longer double-bevel and single-bevel zip right through game, without the animal feeling it so much.
A: If those less-efficient 3:1 heads don't pass-through the animal then it will suffer and feel the ignorance firsthand. We can't guarantee pass-through, but there were several test-trials where our own stubby and thick 175 Grain Scientific Method outperformed our own longer 315 Grain Scientific Method at popping open bone and penetrating. Our 600 Grain is long, but is has a substantially thicker blade and our most manipulated edge-bevel so it performs spin cutting and bone breaching at another level. For the lay-person out there...THE BLADE THICKNESS TO LENGTH RATIO NEEDS TO BE MUCH THICKER AND THE HEADS, ESPECIALLY YOUTH AND TRAD BROADHEADS NEED TO BE SIGNIFICANTLY SHORTER WITH STEEPER BLADE ANGLES THAN WE EVER THOUGHT TO DRAMATICALLY MANIPULATE THE EDGE-BEVEL SIZE AND THUS INCREASE SINGLE -BEVEL EFFICIENCY TO PERFORM BONE-BREACHING AND PASS-THROUGHS AND IS MUCH MORE SIGNIFICANT THAN 3:1 CUTTING DIAMETER TO LENGTH. The longer they are the less they spin-cut and the less single-bevels breach bone. This is just one of many important factors in enhancing single-bevel efficiency that have been totally misunderstood and botched up by primarily broadhead companies and well meaning traditional archers for years. We made 3:1 and even longer than 3:1 heads, including â…ž inch cutting diameter long and skinny heads and it is not the case for single-bevels out of 14 lbs. Bows through X-Bows. If the longer 3:1 style single-bevel with less of a manipulated edge, less spin-cutting, less bone breaching and lower rates of pass through fails to breach bone for the trad archer, or the X-Bow hunter, then the animal will feel it in the un-breached bone more than it needs to suffer. Nothing matters other than the fact that single-bevels are being asked to perform work in two different directions at the same time, unlike double-bevels and this is an undeniable fact for traditional archers through X-Bow shooters.
Q: But, your heads look different than the others?
A: Yes, our patent pending single-bevel broadheads are very different than other single-bevels and this can be seen in the conversion rate of free broadhead contest winners in traditional archery through, compound and X-Bow circles. They won a 100-600 grain broadhead from us and then typically bought more from us and/or spread the word. This is how we sold out of broadheads and funded increasing our line-up a couple of years sooner than we had ever dreamed of or planned. The best way to find out for yourself is to purchase a single test head and then try them out and think for yourself before investing in another pack of broadheads form any other manufacturer in the archery industry, including us.
Q: Yes, Bishop/Bridgeport is increasing it’s line-up and taking on the mechanical market with your Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill and your Roc Rudder Blade, TM. Do single-bevels work more like a rudder than what was first thought?
A: Yes, they do for the most part and we are excited about the Mechanical Animal Drill taking on the mechanical market and overseas importers with a whole new twist. It is also the first mechanical for traditional archers all the way through 185 LBS. crossbows.
Q: How would traditional archers even think like that with your new mechanical head as they tend to like tradition by definition.
A: Some are stuck in an almost comical elitist dogma, but the majority of trad folks are not like that at all and we believe that we can convert traditional archers and ultra-wide-cut mechanical shooters all at the same time with our Mechanical Animal Drill. Besides, traditional archers have changed and many do use modern broadhead technology to harvest animals with the least suffering as possible all of the time.
Q: What in the world kind of broadhead technology do trad guys use?
A: When you really think about it almost 100% of the traditional archers do not use a stone-point anymore.
Q: But, stone-points such as Dalton Drills and Benton Blades are an obsession of yours, so much so that Bishop has tribute names after these points in your 125 Grain Dicing Drill and 315 Grain Scientific Method.
A: Yes, it is not meant to put down stone-points. If we could somehow research ancient societies success rates with stone-points compared to modern day expendables it would probobly be an eye opener. The edge-bevel of our Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill is rooted in the past, as all of our heads honor both the past and the future of arrow-points the best that we can. Research is good, but those ancient societies overcame more with their stone-points in one month than we will ever know in a lifetime. While the Mechanical Animal Drill is a four blade, it's cutting bevel honors them as they were the last ones we know of to make a variation of that kind of a bevel in stone-points. The prototype of the Mechanical Animal Drill was a botched up head, where the single-bevel edge chattered and failed. It was sitting in a bucket of garbage arrows for months. We found the mutilated Mechanical Animal Drill inside of that head for the first time only months later either on accident or faith. It is data and research driven, but in many ways was influenced by various stone-point bevels dating back over 75,000 years ago.
Q: How does the bevel work?
A: It goes against what we worked so hard to achieve to prevent edge-bevel chatter in single-bevels and is a new way of thinking grounded far past the history of traditional archery into the stone-age as well as the future of archery. The Mechanical Animal Drill is a great pass-through focused trad through X-Bow North American Big-Game Mechanical Broadhead filled with bloodthirsty rage and hunger.
Q: That is crazy. A mechanical broadhead for TRAD through X-BOWS in the Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill that you are claiming can be shot with filed-tip point of impact beyond 150 yards. That is what you are saying. A mechanical broadhead for trad shooters as well?
A: Yes, the Mechanical Animal Drill is the first mechanical we would recommend to trad shooters or anyone else.
Q: Is your Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill more lethal than Bishop’s/Bridgeport’s Scientific Method?
A: LOL...No, it is not even close between our Patent Pending Scientific Method and our Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill Four Blade. The Scientific Method is much more lethal than the Mechanical Animal Drill, but we like the four blade Mechanical Animal Drill’s idiot-proofness, propensity for pass-through on all North American Big Game with superior laceration channelling and long-range arrow flight compared to traditional mechanicals as well as all other four blade cut-on-contact heads in the world. We hope to take the entire mechanical broadhead market share from the overseas importers with our cut-on-contact Mechanical Animal Drill by firestorm, like we did with the premium broadhead market from the overseas importers.
Q: You would even put your Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill mechanical broadhead up against any four blade cut-on-contact fixed blade for pass-through?
A: Yes, and "S" cut bone popping and breaching with superior laceration channels to much wider cutting diameter fixed blades and mechanicals. Our Mechanical Animal Drill is the World's Most Lethal Mechanical Broadhead and the World's Most Lethal Four Blade Cut-On-Contact Broadhead as well.
Q: The Patent Pending Mechanical Animal Drill will be cut-on-contact. It is also the first mechanical to be fifty state legal. Can you tell us more about it?
A: LOL...We can tell you more about it the first week after Easter of 2017 when it comes out.
100-150 GRAIN PATENT PENDING DICING DRILL DEVELOPMENT
Q: What about your Patent Pending Dicing Drills? We heard your Mechanical Animal Drill has some geometry that is taken from and similar to the Dicing Drills. Can your Dicing Drills be improved through the work you have been doing with them to develop the Mechanical Animal Drill?
A: Yes, the Dicing Drills can be improved. Just cut the first set of blade angles off from them.
Q: Do you mean the tanto-tip?
A: No, no we have a modified tanto-tip on our patent pending single-bevels heads from 100-250 grains and a more traditional broadhead report style tanto-tip on our 315 and 600 grain single-bevels. The modified single-bevel tanto-tip from 100-250 grains allows our bevels to perform work immediately on impact and sooner than traditional style and longer broadhead report style tanto-tips, while maintaining structural integrity. The Dicing Drills though could be improved by removing the first set of blade angles from the factory. Not the tip, but the entire section above the widest cutting diameter blade angles.
Q: Why would you do that when they are selling out right now and have trouble keeping them in stock?
A: The Dicing Drills spin-cut more, breach bone more and pass-through more like this for us than they do in their stock concave configuration. We are not a business, we are more of a patriotic archery project and it is much like how most people prepare for archery season by putting everything they have into it long before the season starts. We put all of our blood sweat and tears into the effort and value that moment of truth when the arrow has to get through. We would do anything to increase the odds of that for our clients and this includes walking away from a Dicing Drill market that we have poured in thousands of hours in to establish. We at first thought it was the concave configuration, combined with the shorter and thicker blades, but the Dicing Drills perform better for us with the first set of blade angles removed completely making them substantially shorter than they come from the factory. We now believe the concave configuration mimics the spin rates of shorter single-bevel broadheads by providing less resistance to the head's own rotational effects. The first set of blade angles on all concave heads are better off completely removed, or that material removed and then put into the blade thickness which also manipulates the size of the bevel. Believe it or not with a 40 lbs. trad bow, or a 185 lbs. X-Bow, the modified Dicing Drills, where the first set of blade angles were removed with a carbide blade breach and pop open bone more effectively than our stock Dicing Drills. It is not to put down our own Patent Pending Dicing Drills, it is just that we want to develop the most efficient and most lethal no-holds barred single-bevels for 14 lbs. through 185 lbs. bows and crossbows.
Q: Wouldn’t a head like that look funny?
A: Yes, it would look funny, but we don’t think the animal is concerned about the look of it, or if it is shot with a forty-pound stick-bow, an eighty-pound compound bow, or a 185 pound crossbow. It is for use with all kinds of archery tackle.
Q: Why don’t you make this head now to keep up with demand and what would you call it?
A: We are making it now and it is called a 100, 125 and 150 Grain Scientific Method.
Q: Are the 100-150 Grain Scientific Method prototypes superior to your own 100-150 Grain Dicing Drill in spin-cutting laceration channels and bone breaching?
A: Yes, it is superior to our own Dicing Drills across multiple metrics of “S” popping open bone to spin-cutting, pass-throughs and ultra-long range arrow flight.
Q: Are you abandoning the Dicing Drill after selling thousands of those heads since just opening up in July?
A: Yes, we are abandoning the Dicing Drill development, but we have some clients that have harvested game and have a strong gravitation towards, almost relationship with our Patent Pending Dicing Drill. Therefore we will keep offering the Dicing Drill as a courtesy to our clients forever.
Q: It seems like it might be a poor business decision, even if the replacement 100-150 Grain Scientific Methods heads will be superior. Haven't the Dicing Drills sold out several times and they would both compete in a 100-150 grain two-blade space against each other?
A: Yeah, we don’t care about business. We have sold thousands of broadheads now and nobody here has been paid a single penny as of this date. We just want to put out the best no holds barred free from corporate outdoor industry restrictions broadheads on earth. In fact, the 100-150 Grain Scientific Method development and production was funded from our broadhead sales and nobody here wanted any kind of paycheck. We have had to borrow zero dollars and our growth has come from the sales we have had. Everybody here just wants to push the envelope and put out the best thing we can, even if it makes no business sense, or competes with one of our own products. Our Patent Pending Dicing Drills will still always be available to our clients as a courtesy and some models of Dicing Drills are sold out right now and yet more are being produced to ensure they are available forever. It is just that we want to do the best we can by the animal and it is about developing the best broadhead tools we can more than a business venture. Again, the Dicing Drills will still be available forever.
100-150 GRAIN PATENT PENDING SCIENTIFIC METHOD DEVELOPMENT
Q: Do you have a timeline on your 100-150 Grain Scientific Methods?
A: No, we do not have a release date of a 100-150 Grain Scientific Method, but it is a fulltime effort to keep expanding our machined broadhead line-up. The #HOLYTRINITY Three Blade Double-Bevels are about done and will be released the day after Easter and our single-bevel Mechanical Animal Drills are on schedule for the following week after Easter 2017. We hope to get the 100-150 Grain Scientific Methods out about that time as well. We are having a lot of trouble machining a 600 Grain #HOLYTRINITY and 800 Grain Scientific Method do to their unique size. We have spent several hours trying to find ways to machine what has never been done before in the 600 Grain #HOLYTRINITY and the 800 Grain Scientific Method as the 600 Grain Scientific Method was achieved with the machines maxed out and it has proved challenging. We should have all of our new heads hitting the market around Easter of 2017.
Q: The Scientific Methods in 100-150 grains seem like they will be short and thick. Are your Patent Pending Line-Up of 100-315 grain broadheads models for compounds and X-Bows only since they fly with field-tip point of impact beyond 100 yards?
A: No, our patent pending single-bevel broadheads in the various models are indeed for compounds and X-Bows. They are also for ultra-low poundage youth bows and traditional bows. They are superior tools where single-bevel broadhead efficiency to breach bone, while creating more rapid spin-cutting based spiral laceration channels and easily passing-through animals is even more important. The ability of a single-bevel to perform work in two different directions at the same time is even more important for low poundage traditional and youth set-ups to harvest the life of the animal as quickly as possible than looking like a broadhead report style single-bevel.
Q: What are your most lethal broadhead models?
A: They are all at another level above and beyond broadhead report style single-bevels according to nine out of ten of our free broadhead competition winners of our random drawings on chat-boards and social media and our clients that have shot them. But, our 175 Grain Scientific Method and 600 Grain Scientific Method over-performs along with our 100-150 Grain Scientific Method Prototypes, compared to our Dicing Drills and other weight Scientific Methods. All of our Scientific Methods are our most lethal models, but they should all be thought of more as broadhead tools for specific purposes than what head is the most lethal. For North American Big Game, we will never put out a 2, 3, or 4 blade broadhead that will not have a high propensity for pass-through based blood-trails. We just won't do it and they are all really good tools for getting the arrow all the way through every big-game animal in North America. For Africa, our 600 Grain Scientific Method is the best tool.
600 GRAIN SCIENTIFIC METHOD ARROW FLIGHT & ARROW SPINE
Q: It seems like you would have arrow spine issues with your 600 grain head?
A: No, we actually don’t have any arrow spine issues with our 600 Grain Scientific Method at all, but we sometimes can with our 250 and 315 grain heads on severely underspined arrows.
Q: The 250 and 315 grain Scientific Methods don’t fly well do to having trouble finding an arrow spine stiff enough, but the 600 do fly well? No disrespect, but that doesn’t make any sense.
A: We are referring to severely underspined shafts of 500 and 600 spine for the 250 and 315 not flying so well here and 600 grain heads flying perfectly with them.
Q: Why would you shoot the 250, 315 and 600 Grain Scientific Methods with 500 and 600 spine arrow shafts?
A: Our legal recommended that we shoot them all through a shooting machine several times, in case a bowhunter ever put a carbon arrow shaft through the back of their hand and attributed it to our heavier heads. After these tests it was very clear that there are a lot of misconceptions about static and dynamic spine of carbon arrow shafts. It is clear that carbon shafts break into the back of archer’s hands only in very rare cases with 635 grain or even lightweight 75 grain points, only because the shaft was defective, or more likely they did not flex their arrow shafts.
Q: How do you know this?
A: Because, we have shot our 600 grain and 635 grain broadhead on 500 and 600 spine shafts thousands of times and not only does the shaft not break...we were able to achieve perfect arrow flight with a 600 spine carbon shaft and 600 grain broadhead out of a 72 pound bow. We were unable to crack various brands of carbon shafts in 500 and 600 spine with our 250 and 315 grain heads, but we were not able to achieve perfect arrow flight with them with these severely underspined shafts like we did with our 600 grain and 635 grain broadheads.
Q: So if someone breaks a shaft it could be with a 100 grain mechanical or a 600 grain fixed blade broadhead if the shaft is already cracked and not flexed/checked, but the shaft did not fail after thousands of shots with a 635 grain broadhead and 600 spine shafts of various brands?
A: Correct.
Q: You are even saying the 600 grain and 635 grain broadheads achieved perfect arrow flight out of 600 spine shafts of various brands, but the 250 and 315 did not?
A: Yes, and we started calling it the shoestring effect, but we were just making sure the arrow shaft would not break. We never expected to achieve perfect arrow flight.
Q: What kind of spine do you need for the 250 and 315 grain heads?
A: We were able to get perfect arrow flight with some underspined arrows of 400 spine, but 340 spine and stiffer are appropriate for the FOC based forgiveness built into the 250, 315 and 600 Grain Scientific Methods, even though it does not chart out like that on software programs or arrow charts. It is pretty easy to find a 340 or stiffer static spine arrow shaft nowadays.
Q: In some ways the 600 Grain Scientific Method seems more forgiving than the 250 and 315 Grain Scientific Method?
A: LOL...Yes, it actually is much easier to build FOC and the problem of larger heads sometimes breaking above the threads on hard impacts has never been an issue for us as our 600 grain head is pretty bulletproof with our proprietary Bishop S7 Tool Steel. It is easy to achieve perfect arrow flight with our 600 Grain Scientific Method compared to our own 250 and 315 Grain Scientific Methods.
TOOL STEEL DEVELOPMENT
Q: Are you going to sell the 600 Grain in Bridgeport Tool Steel?
A: Not at this time and we do not have plans to do so at this time.
Q: You guys were thinking about putting out a third tool steel already proven on the market, or maybe even the first machined stainless steel. Would either of these be as strong as the Bridgeport Ultra-High-End 41L40 Tool Steel?
A: LOL...No, they would not even be comparable to the Bridgeport. Our Bishop heads are about three times stronger than our own Bridgeport. The Bridgeport is several times stronger than a Pipeline Archery Tool Steel or Stainless Steel that we are exploring and might put out to include more bowhunters in our grassroots efforts to take over the corporate archery industry. They would hit a much lower price-point in the Pipeline Archery Branded Steel and would still beat out 99% of the broadheads out there for structural integrity. But, would not be comparable to our Bridgeport or Bishop Heads.
Q: What is the difference between the Bridgeport and Bishop Broadheads?
A: They are the same CNC Machined Heads, but different tool steels and can be pulled from the same quiver with the same point of impact. The Bridgeport have a .010 concentric ring just above the threads to identify them and you can tell within about five minutes of training, just by looking at the different grains of the tool steels.
Q: Are the Bridgeport Heads strong enough for North America?
A: LOL...Yes, the Bridgeport Heads are strong enough for North America, Africa and elephant hunting and while the Bishops are about three times stronger than our own Bridgeport CNC Machined Tool-Steel heads it is just another example of us pushing the envelope as far as we can in honor of the life of the animal. We look at it like sighting in your bow and practicing before shooting at living animals. Just basic things everybody should do to honor life. Since we have no investors we can do anything we want to and our proprietary Bishop S7 is just another example of us going to extremes to try to prevent tip curl etc.
STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY DEVELOPMENT
Q: The material and tool steel leads to structural integrity?
A: No, it is one important factor or link in a chain that leads to increased structural integrity, but various grades of tool steel in a component based head, or a poorly designed 3:1 style head with 25 degree bevels is a futile and wimpy effort.
Q: What do you mean?
A: To build structural integrity you need a four link chain as a minimum starting point: 1. Superior anti-tip curl design, superior edge-bevel degree design, superior blade thickness, superior tip design etc., linked together with 2. Superior construction of CNC Machined Heads out of one piece of solid stock rather than forging, metal injection molding, swagging, screws, components, aluminum ferrules, welds etc., linked together with 3. Superior material for broadhead applications so not titanium, not stainless steel, not high carbon steel, and not even high end tool steels....you need to get the best tool steels you can find and develop further linked together with 4. Superior heat treating that is appropriate for the steel being used and for a broadhead application so your broadheads don’t shatter like glass like some others are notorious for doing. So the steel is only one of four important factors linked together in building structural integrity into broadheads. It is something the corporate outdoor industry is pretty mediocre at...at best with investors to report their profits to as all of these essential links in the chain of structural integrity can drive up production costs exponentially and pretty quickly.
Q: So you are saying it is like a four link chain and there is no room for a single weak link in building a broadhead with the most structural integrity?
A: Yes, because serious bowhunters know that they cannot retract, or recall the arrow sailing toward the live animal. They know they can’t turn back time and this moment of truth is serious to them along with countless hours of pre-season preparation time that the corporate outdoor industry investors cannot always see. This is the space we drove a “Mack Truck” through and sold thousands of higher priced broadheads without advertising, because bowhunters spend 99% of their time preparing and ensuring they honor the animal. Many of the broadhead choices that have flooded the market are about outdoor industry business plans typically focused on putting resources into paid endorsements and advertisements, but they don’t account for the drive, passion and insane preparation all serious bowhunters have invested in the effort as the ultimate conservationists.
Q: Does this mean all bowhunters should buy your broadheads?
A: LOL...No, it is about achieving harmony and gracefulness of your traditional archery through compound bow through X-Bow set ups and it does not mean buy broadheads from Bishop Archery at all. We are selling and growing faster than we have the capacity to keep up with and we don’t have to try to introduce our broadheads to people at this point. Another thing is that archery such a personalized experience. Find what works best for you and always be open to trying something new here and there, but lock your set-up in and become one with your archery tackle. If you have never lost an animal with archery tackle then keep on with what you have. But, if you have ever lost an animal with archery tackle, after pouring all of those hundreds of hours into the preparation of the bowhunting season, then for less than the cost of half-a-tank of fuel for your vehicle try out a single test head from www.bishoparchery.com before buying a whole pack of broadheads form anybody, including us.
FEAR IS A LIAR
YOU CAN'T
You can’t take the premium broadhead market share with a business plan, less than $30 in your bank account and a prayer. It is not a realistic goal and it will never work.
You can’t start a business on July 4, 2016 with under $30 in your bank account and a tiny shoe-box full of broadheads and expect to be successful, just because that is the date you picked, or the date you like to launch your company.
You can’t spark a transformational shift in the archery industry without the archery cliques and institutional powers permission. You have to pay them to endorse your products and you never accounted for those expenses or advertising costs per pack. By the time you went through our distribution and supply chains they would cost over $500 for three Bishop Broadheads. Nice patent pending designs, but we have to pass on this because from a business perspective it is just not possible.
You can’t take on the major outdoor industry corporations with their full-time engineers and paid staff with your volunteers and unpaid staff. You don’t have enough hours in a day or any paid staff to compete with any of them. We just can't invest in this knowing that it will never work like this where you want to control where we source the metal. You can't have it both ways, if we help you then we need to be able to decide on these things so that it is much more profitable.
You can’t put all of those resources into the broadheads rather than the full color advertisements and television endorsements. You can't refuse to compromise on anything and expect us to invest all of that money into the project. We have to pass on this and wish you well on it.
You can’t make a 600 Grain broadhead. It will never achieve good arrow flight and it will never sell.
You can’t sell broadheads that cost that much to produce or sell at that price-point. Nobody will ever pay that much for broadheads. It will never work.
You can’t be the first company to denounce the single-bevel broadhead reports. You have to make single-bevels that work like everyone else's and web-link back to the broadhead reports.
You can’t make non-vented broadheads for 14 pound bows through 185 pound crossbows. They will never fly well beyond 30 yards. It will be a disaster.
You can’t build broadheads with steep blade angles and steep edge-bevels for traditional bows, they will never breach bone more efficiently than 3:1 broadheads with traditional tanto-tips and 25 degree bevels.
You can’t make all of your products in the USA anymore and still stay in business. You just can’t do it the way you want. If you want us to help you financially to bring Bishop to market then you have to let us decide on the manufacturing and the distribution.
You can’t launch the world’s first pro-shop only broadhead and give dealers whole county selling territories and all of your profits, as you will loose potential sales to other pro-shops in the same county. It will never work and you are basically giving broadheads away to the pro-shops for them to be your advertisers and they just don't have anywhere the reach magazine advertisements and television shows have. It will fail the way you want to do it.
You can’t get a 600 Grain broadhead to fly without breaking an arrow shaft into the back of the archer's hand. They will fall like a brick at forty yards and people will never buy them.
You can’t get deer hunters to buy your broadheads and a 600 Grain broadhead will never be accurate beyond twenty yards. They will never sell for a $229.99 price-point. It will never work.
You can’t design nonvented broadheads to pop balloons beyond 100 yards. It is just not possible to engineer nonvented fixed bladed broadheads with that kind of surface area. It can’t be done.
You can’t design single-bevels that have more rotational effects by doing the complete opposite of what everyone else is doing related to the broadhead reports. People will never try them.
You can’t develop your metallurgy program like that it will never work financially. We already have proven tool steels and high carbon steels on the market that are plenty strong enough. Nobody is that hardcore of a bowhunter where they are going to push their broadheads that far in North America, or even for dangerous game.
You can’t get steep edge-bevels to spin-cut more in single-bevels designs than 25 degree bevels and sub 25 degree bevels called for in the broadhead reports. You should follow the directions in the single-bevel broadhead reports like everybody else.
You can’t shorten single-bevel broadheads and add weight into the thickness of the blades to manipulate the edge-bevel like you are saying and expect them to be more efficient to “S” breach bone. Even if you do they will never sell at $89.99 and you should just forge them overseas rather than machine them in America. It will be even more of a financial disaster if you machine them in America.
You can't make non-vented heads for compounds and crossbows, because they will never fly with field-tip point of impact beyond 100 yards.
You can’t improve the traditional broadhead report tanto-tip to make the broadheads more efficient at “S” bone breaching and pass-through by getting to the bevel sooner like you are saying and even if you do it, nobody will ever accept the looks of them.
You can’t shoot 315 Grain broadheads beyond fifty yards. They will dive bomb and hit the ground.
You can’t make a 100 Grain deer through dangerous game broadhead like you want because it is overkill for deer and it will never sell.
You can’t take market-share from $29.99 price point broadheads. Nobody is going to switch over to your higher end broadheads no matter how many broadhead giveaway contests you have.
You can’t get people to buy your broadheads over a new pro-line bow. It is just not going to happen.
You can’t give away broadheads in chat board competitions and expect expandable broadhead users to convert over to your cut on contact single-bevels. It won’t work.
You can’t like everything and post pictures and videos all over social media of your broadheads and expect people to buy $79.99 on up broadheads with no advertising budget.
You can’t do it without putting most of the money into advertising and very little money into the actual product. It will never work and you need to spend your money on advertising and paying celebrities rather than spending it on the actual broadheads.
You just can’t do it like that and you need to cheapen the materials and production of your broadheads so you can afford advertising and sticking to the proven outdoor industry blueprint.
You can’t expand your broadhead line-up just a few months after opening up. You can’t grow that fast or you will go out of business.
You can’t name a broadhead after your God and expect people from all different faiths and walks of life to buy it. People who aren’t Christians will never buy it.
You can’t just decide to release a broadhead months ahead of time on Christmas Day and name it #HOLYTRINITY.
You can’t design a non-vented three blade cut-on-contact to fly with field-tip point of impact beyond 100 yards. It is just not possible.
You can’t make a non-vented three blade broadhead, release it on Christmas and expect it to sell out in four days. It will never sell. It will be a disaster.
You can’t pop balloons with a non-vented three blade beyond 150 yards. It will never fly with field-tips beyond 40 yards.
You can’t get people to sharpen their own broadheads. They will never do that you need to make replaceable blade heads overseas and advertise that you assemble them in America if you really want to make some money and stay in business. They are all overkill and nobody is ever going to buy machined heads like this. They aren't shooting them at tanks. We can’t invest in this.
You can’t partner with and sell products that are only made in the USA. We live in a global economy and it is just not possible to have everything made in the USA anymore. We just can’t help you with this business venture. It will never work the way you want to do it.
You can’t make something in the USA and expect it to be superior to products made overseas anymore and still make enough money for the investors to get behind it. It is just not possible, unless you make stamped heads or use other materials that are cheaper, or you will go out of business within a month and you will never be able to expand. Nobody is going to ever pay $150 for a pack of broadheads no matter how good they work.
You can’t do it like you want to do it with our money. We will help you if you let us make your single-bevels overseas. Otherwise, from a business perspective, it just doesn’t work for us and no investment group is going to get behind this. You are nowhere near ready to open on July 4th of 2016. Maybe July 4th of 2017 but who is going to fund it? We want to help you guys, but we just can’t do it like this unless we outsource this Bishop project overseas. It will never work.
BISHOP
ARCHERY
OPENED
ON
JULY
4TH
2016
ON
A
PRAYER
AND
TOOK
MARKET
SHARE
BY
FIRESTORM
FROM
PREMIUM
SECTOR
OVERSEAS
BROADHEAD
IMPORTERS
IN
LESS
THAN
SIX
MONTHS
IN
BUSINESS
BISHOP
WOULD
DISPROVE
ALL
OF
THE
ABOVE
CAN'TS
AND
QUICKLY
EXPAND
TO
OFFER
ONE
OF
THE
LARGEST
CUT
ON
CONTACT
CNC
BROADHEAD
LINE-UPS
IN
THE
HISTORY
OF
THE
ARCHERY
INDUSTRY
ALWAYS
ALLOW
YOUR
FAITH
TO
BE
GREATER
THAN
YOUR
FEAR
#CRANKUPTHECUT
>>>=PERPETUAL=MOTION=>
www.bishoparchery.com